nfs mount problem

[Ed Greshko]

On 04/28/2010 02:13 AM, Anne Wilson wrote:
> On Tuesday 27 April 2010 06:24:56 pm Martin Kho wrote:
>   
>> On Tuesday 27 April 2010 19:14:15 Eli Wapniarski wrote:
>>     
>>> On Tuesday 27 April 2010 15:45:36 Anne Wilson wrote:
>>>       
>>>> On Tuesday 27 April 2010 11:38:17 am Ed Greshko wrote:
>>>>         
>>>>> On 04/27/2010 05:22 PM, Anne Wilson wrote:
>>>>>           
>>>>>> Ed and Eli - sorry for the delay on this.  I made a big bwa-hwa and
>>>>>> destroyed my Win7 completely, to the point where I had to do a
>>>>>> factory default install. That of course then needed
>>>>>> re-partitioning, re-installing F13 and everything else.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'm no nearer sorting this.  I can edit the files on the F12
>>>>>> laptop, but not on the F13 one.  You investigation raises
>>>>>> questions, but frankly I think this is maybe beyond my expertise. 
>>>>>> I'll subscribe to the fedora-test list today. Have you raised the
>>>>>> problem with them yet?
>>>>>>             
>>>>> Yes...  Didn't get too much in the way of responses....  And today,
>>>>> less than 30 minutes ago, I wrote the list to inform them....
>>>>>
>>>>> As Emily Litella would say...."Never mind".
>>>>>
>>>>> Someone had rolled back the rhelv4 server to a previous snapshot
>>>>> where the idmapd.conf hadn't been modified correctly.  I made the
>>>>> common mistake of assuming....
>>>>>           
>>>> OK - so it solved it for you.  It looks as though mine is a different
>>>> issue, then.  I can't see how it can be a server problem when the files
>>>> are editable on the other laptop.  It has to be something local, but
>>>> I've no idea what.
>>>>
>>>> Anne
>>>>         
>>> It could be a bug?
>>>
>>> Eli
>>>       
>> Hi Anne,
>>
>> I'm not using nfs, but I say a Fedora wiki-page [1] telling that in F13
>> NFSv4 will be the default. May be this can give you a clue?
>>
>> Martin Kho
>>
>> [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/NFSv4Default
>>     
> That's worrying.  I'm pretty sure CentOS doesn't support NFS4 - RHEL may do in 
> the release that came out only a week or two ago, but didn't before that.  I 
> would think that the server will have to support the same protocol as the 
> client is using, for it to work?
>   
Centos supports NFS4.  Just like RHEL does. 
> The wiki page says that the transition should be seamless, and the only 
> dependency is nfs-utils.  I have nfs-utils installed.  This is something of a 
> show-stopper for me.
>   
Seamless is a matter of opinion.  There are differences in how mount
points work.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 260 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/kde/attachments/20100428/feb5abe1/attachment.bin