Modular KDE?

Jaroslav Reznik jreznik at redhat.com
Mon Sep 6 13:15:29 UTC 2010


On Monday, September 06, 2010 01:19:13 am Chris Smart wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 3:59 AM, Kevin Kofler <kevin.kofler at chello.at> wrote:
> > In addition to what Rex said above, it would also cause massive bloat to
> > update metadata, hurting even people who don't run KDE at all (at every
> > single update push, even those which don't touch KDE packages, you still
> > have to download all the metadata each time it changes), and possibly
> > adding up to a lot more bandwidth than what you save by not downloading
> > some apps.
> 
> Interesting thought, I wonder what the consequences would actually be.
> Anyway, Rex said that we're moving towards a more modular KDE anyway,
> because of the ability to run them on netbooks, etc. Will be
> interesting to see if this becomes a problem.

We are moving towards more likely "logical units" instead of complete splits - 
like minimal packages that makes sense etc. On the other hand - upstream wants 
to aim more on individual applications instead of one big packages (but still 
packaged together).

R. 
> > All this has been pointed out in previous threads. It would really help
> > if users would read the f… uh… fine ;-) mailing list archives rather
> > than asking the same questions again and again!
> 
> As mentioned, I did go through all threads for 2010..
> 
> -c
> _______________________________________________
> kde mailing list
> kde at lists.fedoraproject.org
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/kde
> New to KDE4? - get help from http://userbase.kde.org

-- 
Jaroslav Řezník <jreznik at redhat.com>
Software Engineer - Base Operating Systems Brno

Office: +420 532 294 275
Mobile: +420 602 797 774
Red Hat, Inc.                               http://cz.redhat.com/


More information about the kde mailing list