<p dir="ltr"><br>
On Aug 1, 2015 14:02, "Markus Slopianka" <<a href="mailto:kamikazow@gmx.de">kamikazow@gmx.de</a>> wrote:<br>
><br>
> On Saturday 01 August 2015 08:58:44 Gerald B. Cox wrote:<br>
><br>
> > But moving back from the lurch into the pedantic, my point was that it's<br>
> > extremely<br>
> > easy to install and use whatever applications you want - and if you're<br>
> > unhappy with<br>
> > the performance or capabilities of an application, that should be discussed<br>
> > upstream.<br>
><br>
> QtWebKit and KHTML are both unmaintained and insecure.<br>
> I find it absolutely puzzling that some here argue for insecure defaults for<br>
> web browsers but opening a few ports to make KDE Connect work out of the box<br>
> is apparently out of the question security-wise...<br>
><br>
> Why are insecure and unmaintained browsers even on the table as defaults?<br>
><br>
I don't know... as I suggested above, why don't you ask upstream. </p>