<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote">On Sat, Aug 1, 2015 at 7:28 AM, Markus Slopianka <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:kamikazow@gmx.de" target="_blank">kamikazow@gmx.de</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div style="overflow:hidden">So, Juk instead of Amarok then and phonon-vlc instead of phonon-gstreamer?<br>
No. It's the distributor's responsibility to pick defaults best suited for its<br>
user base. Consistent themes from boot splash to the desktop wallpaper is a<br>
very common area of distro customization and Fedora does that as well.<br>
If you don't like customizations by the distributor, maybe Gentoo or Arch are<br>
better suited for you.</div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Customizations are different than setting default applications. Themes are associated with</div><div>branding. That's apples and oranges. Tweaks are also different, as the recent change that</div><div>restored Konsole to the desktop pulldown. This thread was about Konqueror - and I mentioned</div><div>the other applications I used as an example that I customize on my own. I have absolutely no issues</div><div>with the chosen default applications - and know of no reason they should be changed.</div><div><br></div><div>But moving back from the lurch into the pedantic, my point was that it's extremely</div><div>easy to install and use whatever applications you want - and if you're unhappy with</div><div>the performance or capabilities of an application, that should be discussed upstream.</div><div><br></div><div><br></div></div></div></div>