<p dir="ltr"><br>
On Aug 7, 2015 9:43 AM, "Kevin Kofler" <<a href="mailto:kevin.kofler@chello.at">kevin.kofler@chello.at</a>> wrote:<br>
><br>
> Mustafa Muhammad wrote:<br>
> > Some of my points were:<br>
> ><br>
> > 1) Almost dead upstream for Konq, vs thriving upstream for Firefox, Konq<br>
> > may have undiscovered security vulnerabilities, but the limited number of<br>
> > users is hiding them.<br>
><br>
> The limited number of users also means nobody will be targeting Konqueror<br>
> with attacks. IMHO, this is actually an advantage.</p>
<p dir="ltr">"Security through irrelevancy" isn't exactly a convincing argument.. </p>
<p dir="ltr">><br>
> A non-KDE browser will NEVER be an option for a KDE spin no matter how often<br>
> you ask for it.<br>
><br>
> Kevin Kofler</p>
<p dir="ltr">Isn't that for the vote to decide, Kevin? Hence, you know, the vote? We wouldn't be the first distro to decide that a "pure" KDE experience isn't in the best interests of the users. _______________________________________________<br>
> kde mailing list<br>
> <a href="mailto:kde@lists.fedoraproject.org">kde@lists.fedoraproject.org</a><br>
> <a href="https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/kde">https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/kde</a><br>
> New to KDE4? - get help from <a href="http://userbase.kde.org">http://userbase.kde.org</a></p>