<div dir="ltr"><br><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Sun, Aug 9, 2015 at 11:36 PM, Sindre Wetjen <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:sindre.w@gmail.com" target="_blank">sindre.w@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><span>On Sunday 09 August 2015 10:34:48 Gerald B. Cox wrote:<br>
> On Sun, Aug 9, 2015 at 10:24 AM, Mustafa Muhammad <<a href="mailto:mustafa1024m@gmail.com" target="_blank">mustafa1024m@gmail.com</a>><br>
><br>
> wrote:<br>
> > OK, I didn't know this.<br>
> ><br>
> > But QtWebKit is not on par with upstream WebKit, not even close, not when<br>
> > Chromium used WebKit, and not now.<br>
<br>
</span>Its hard to find any real data on this. If you have any, please share. Granted<br>
WebKit is lagging behind and Safari (the only major browser using it) is being<br>
called the new IE6, but it is still an active and popular rendering engine.<br></blockquote><div><br>You can test Konq on your machine, for me I get 355 in <a href="http://html5test.com" target="_blank">html5test.com</a><br></div><div>Chrome switched to Blink in version 28<br>I tested Konqueror 355<br>From the site [1]<br>Chrome 24 433<br></div><div>Safari 9 400<br></div><div>Safari 8 396<br></div><div><br>So even 2 years ago, Chrome is ahead of what we have now.<br><br><a href="http://html5test.com/compare/browser/chrome-24/safari-9.0/safari-8.0.html" target="_blank">[1] http://html5test.com/compare/browser/chrome-24/safari-9.0/safari-8.0.html</a><br></div><div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<span><br>
> > Chromium is a very good choice, it also integrates well with kwallet, but<br>
> > it is not in Fedora.<br>
><br>
</span>> .... (cut)<br>
<span>><br>
> That said however, I'm not suggesting it replace Konqueror as the default.<br>
> If people want it, or<br>
> Chrome for that matter, it's a trivial matter to install.<br>
<br>
</span>Actually, that makes much more sense. (to be clear, Chromium not Chrome)<br>
- It has better support for a lot of things.<br>
- It is targeted by more developers which means that less things will go wrong<br>
- It integrates better with KDE.<br>
- Google has not yet decided to enforce any central control on it.<br>
- It is possible to get "new" flash.<br>
- The UI is familiar and can be synced with existing accounts for a larger<br>
part of the population.<br>
<br>
And if what Kevin said about the development of Blink is true, then there is<br>
still a hope we can get it in Fedora.<br>
<br>
Off course this is all in the future, but I think it underlines the unnecessary<br>
change to Firefox because it is not a good choice either for non-power users.<br>
<div><div>_______________________________________________<br>
kde mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:kde@lists.fedoraproject.org" target="_blank">kde@lists.fedoraproject.org</a><br>
<a href="https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/kde" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/kde</a><br>
New to KDE4? - get help from <a href="http://userbase.kde.org" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://userbase.kde.org</a></div></div></blockquote></div><br></div></div>