more bug triage fun

[Chuck Ebbert]

On Sat, 3 Jul 2010 23:37:53 -0600
Kevin Fenzi <kevin at scrye.com> wrote:

> Greetings. 
> 
> Finally sat down to look at moving forward on the kernel bug traging
> stuff (see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/KernelBugTriage )
> 
> Some more thoughts: 
> 
> Would it be useful to add tracker bugs for [PATCH] bugs? Or is that
> easy enough to query for if you are looking for them? Should we ask
> submitters to make sure they also submit upstream?
> 

I've been adding Keywords: Patch, but a tracker might be better.

That can mean several different things:

1) A patch to our kernel.spec file or other fedora-only thing.
2) A link to an upstream patch that fixes the bug in our kernel.
3) Something meant for upstream.

> Should we have any tracker for [RFE] bugs as well? 
> 

Probably not worth the trouble.

> I noticed we have: 
> 
> Bug 126342 Meta bug: custom built kernels - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=126342
> 
> Should we close any crazy custom kernel config issues as a duplicate of
> that one?
> 

Yes, I think that's what it's for.