Backport of gssproxy patches for Fedora 19

[Josh Boyer]

On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 04:38:53PM -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
> On Wed, 2013-06-12 at 11:43 -0400, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 09:13:59AM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 04:56:38PM -0400, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> > > > > > > Bruce sent me 2 patches yesterday, but haven't got to test them yet.
> > > > > > > The code is not activated by default, so there is little harm in putting
> > > > > > > them in, the only thing that will fail is gssproxy, as the whole code
> > > > > > > path is enabled only if gssproxy is started at boot.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Did you get a chance to test them?  I'm doing an update today.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Just setting it up, so I'd expect results in a couple hours.
> > > > 
> > > > Hah, bad estimate.  Anyway, 
> > > > 
> > > > 	git://linux-nfs.org/~bfields/linux-topics.git 3.9-gssproxy-backport
> > > > 
> > > > now includes three additional bugfixes that I need to get it working for me.
> > > 
> > > I've added those to the F19 kernel repo.  There isn't a kernel built yet
> > > that contains them, but they'll be included in the next build.
> > 
> > Thanks!  Simo, could you test that when it's available and let me know
> > either way?
> > 
> > As I say it's working for me, but our setups are a little different (the
> > bug fixed by the second patch manifested in a different way for me, for
> > example, though I suspect it was the same bug).
> 
> I'm on PTO through the rest of the week but I can do a quick test as
> soon as someone tells me a kernel is available.

The fixes are in 3.9.6-301.fc19 now.

josh