<br><br><div><span class="gmail_quote">On 6/16/07, <b class="gmail_sendername">Dave Jones</b> <<a href="mailto:davej@redhat.com">davej@redhat.com</a>> wrote:</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
On Sat, Jun 16, 2007 at 03:13:56PM +0100, Chris Brown wrote:<br><br> > I've started playing around with virtualization at work and the first thing<br> > I'd like to query is kqemu's lack of inclusion in the Fedora kernel. It was
<br> > GPL'd in February and although I realise Axel is packaging kmdl/kmods it<br> > would be good to know if this is being queued up for mainline.<br><br>not afaik.. I've not heard of anyone working on it since its initial
<br>opensource'ing, which seemed to be a reactionary thing in response to<br>kvm's gaining popularity.<br><br> > If not then can it be backported for Fedora kernels.<br><br>It was fairly big (but not really invasive fwir), but it's still a delta
<br>that we'd perpetually have to carry vs upstream. Each patch adds a<br>burden towards rebasing, and with no clear path for this to get<br>upstream, it's questionable how long we'd have to carry it, so I'm
<br>not too enthusiastic to be honest.</blockquote><div><br>well but kqemu seems not to break that often I just recompile it after each kernel release and it just works.<br>the code might be big but it does not depend on (fast) changing interfaces.
<br></div><br></div><br>