[Fedora-legal-list] Licence of glew documentation ok now?
Tom "spot" Callaway
tcallawa at redhat.com
Sun Nov 16 21:07:10 UTC 2008
On Sun, 2008-11-16 at 21:49 +0100, Jochen Schmitt wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> in the past the documentation of the glew package was removed because
> it was licensed with a
> non-redistributable license.
> After I have filled a bug on upstreams bug tracking system the license
> was changed. The new
> license text is attached on the and of this mail.
> Now I want to ask, it this ok for Fedora. From my point of view, it is.
Yes, this is MIT now.
More information about the legal