[Fedora-legal-list] LGPL for noncommercial works only?

[Jason L Tibbitts III]

>>>>> "MM" == Matt McCutchen <matt at mattmccutchen.net> writes:

MM> By the way, it's not clear to me whether the choice of GPLv3 rather
MM> than GPLv3+ was intentional.

The source is pretty explicitly GPLv3+.

MM> You might ask upstream whether they will grant GPLv3+, to to make
MM> things easier in the future.

I would expect the person submitting the package to do that.  (Of
course, I would expect them to ask these questions about the weird
licensing, too, but most people just don't care about licensing.)

 - J<