[Fedora-legal-list] Torque License Change.

[Steve Traylen]

On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 6:49 PM, Tom Callaway <tcallawa at redhat.com> wrote:

> On 02/02/2011 02:58 PM, Steve Traylen wrote:
> > The new license claims torque is licensed both by the OpenPBS license
> > and this new Torque license.
> > The torque license v1.0 seems in isolation probably acceptable and
> includes
> > the acknowledgement from the old license.
>
> Well, no. The v1.0 license is clearly non-free.
>
>
Thank's I copy pasted the wrong file but you are step ahead of me.
The torque-3.0.0-snap.201102011355.tar.gz contains the v1.1 file
and I'll move devel to that now. I'll untag the bad build so that it
eventually
disappears.

Steve.


> However: As posted here:
>
> http://www.clusterresources.com/pipermail/torquedev/2011-January/003369.html
>
> There is a Torque v1.1 license attached to that post, which is Free but
> GPL incompatible (due to advertising clause).
>
> I've added it to the licensing list with "TORQUEv1.1" as its short name
> (to cleanly differentiate it from the non-free 1.0 license). Use:
>
> License: OpenPBS and TORQUEv1.1
>
> ~tom
>
> ==
> Fedora Project
>



-- 
Steve Traylen
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/legal/attachments/20110203/023fecc5/attachment.html>