[Fedora-legal-list] Regarding c++ source with a separate license
sanjay.ankur at gmail.com
Mon Mar 14 12:31:47 UTC 2011
On Mon, 2011-03-14 at 00:22 -0400, Tom Callaway wrote:
> In this case, I dug out the file from the SRPM, and determined that
> license on the md5.c file is "zlib", which is fine for Fedora.
> License tag should be:
> License: BSD and zlib
Thanks for the quick reply. I had a tiny clarification to make:
The md5 implementation that this package uses (and the one you saw) is
the one by Peter Deutsch and is listed here. The latter page only
says that one must provide a virtual provides: in the spec,
It does not mention addition to the License: tag.
So, should I add both, the zlib as a license and a virtual provides?
More information about the legal