[Fedora-livecd-list] Re: livecd persistence
mclasen at redhat.com
Fri Aug 17 21:56:55 UTC 2007
On Fri, 2007-08-17 at 16:49 -0500, Douglas McClendon wrote:
> Matthias Clasen wrote:
> > On Fri, 2007-08-17 at 16:40 -0500, Douglas McClendon wrote:
> >> Lastly, wouldn't test2 require an approved feature?
> > Thats the downside of the new feature process with all the approval and
> > tracking and red tape. People start to think that they are not allowed
> > to work on cool stuff unless it has been approved....
> To who are you referring? I've already posted a (rough) implementation,
> and asdas at redhat.com claims to have an alternate implementation (though
> I doubt the claim that it was posted to livecd-list, as I don't remember
> seeing it).
I was just referring to your question about an "approved feature", but
maybe I just misunderstood what you were trying to say.
> Clearly nobody, relating to the livecd persistence issue, thinks that
> they aren't allowed to work on cool stuff. We've already got 2
> implementations, and it sounds like Jeremy may be starting a 3rd next week.
Thats very good, we need cool stuff, the more the better...
More information about the livecd