[Fedora-livecd-list] Time it takes to review bug/patch in bugzilla?

[Bruno Wolff III]

On Tue, Jul 06, 2010 at 16:43:02 -0500,
  Richard Shaw <hobbes1069 at gmail.com> wrote:
> I posted the following patch[1] to the livecd-iso-to-disk script on
> June 17th and still have not gotten any feedback. Not even a "Hey, you
> suck a programming, don't ever do that again".
> 
> This list is relatively low volume, but I can't even count the number
> of times someone has posted about a problem to other lists and I've
> typically seen responses to the effect of, "File a bug report, or
> better, submit a patch!"
> 
> Well that's exactly what I did, but taking nearly a month (and still
> waiting) to receive any feedback does not do much to motivate people
> to participate.

The live spins area of Fedora is understaffed. I want to do more with getting
things improved with livecd-tools, but I am also stuck taking a bigger role
in the spins SIG part, as we are really short handed there. We really need a
few leaders to step up and some worker bees willing take take on things
assigned to them. (I would prefer to be in the worker bee category.)
I also have some other important stuff (Ogre) that I need to get done before
the alpha and it might end up taking up quite a bit of my time.

I'd like to see reviews of the various pending patches get done and have
some sort of process for deciding what needs to happen (just a single review
or is more than one ack needed) before a patch can get applied.

I was also hoping we could get a meeting set up where this stuff could be
hashed up and we could get things moving again. I really don't have the
time to lead this effort, but will provide some help in doing work if
someone else does.