[Fedora-livecd-list] Fedora livecd 16
Joey Boggs
jboggs at redhat.com
Tue May 1 20:06:32 UTC 2012
On 04/28/2012 09:00 AM, Teresa Millan Fernandez wrote:
> Hi Bruno,
> thank you for your quick response.
> I don´t think I expressed my issue well. It has nothing to do with
> Oracle database.
> The servers have Oracle VM sofware/OS installed on them, but the HP
> firmware needs to be updated. The suggestion we got was to install
> Oracle Linux 6 update 2 in order to update firmware and then reinstall
> OVM server. This would be very tedious...
> The issue is really with getting a suitable environment in order to
> update the HP firmware, without affecting the OVM installation.
> I think we´re just going to try it...we may not hit the ld-linux.so.2
> issue, but another one instead, we´ll see...
> Regards,
> T.
>
>
> --- On *Sat, 28/4/12, Bruno Wolff III /<bruno at wolff.to>/* wrote:
>
>
> From: Bruno Wolff III <bruno at wolff.to>
> Subject: Re: [Fedora-livecd-list] Fedora livecd 16
> To: "Teresa Millan Fernandez" <tmf33uk at yahoo.com>
> Cc: livecd at lists.fedoraproject.org
> Date: Saturday, 28 April, 2012, 14:14
>
> On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 12:24:04 +0100,
> Teresa Millan Fernandez <tmf33uk at yahoo.com
> <http://uk.mc1321.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=tmf33uk@yahoo.com>>
> wrote:
> >I was wondering if the Fedora livecd v.16 contains the
> ld-linux.so.2 library, which is where the Oracle Linux 6 update 2
> "boot disk" is failing currently.
>
> Recent versions of glibc seem to provide that version of ld-linux.so.
> All of my machines are using F17 (due for release in a few weeks) or
> rawhide, so I can't easily check F16, but it probably also has the
> same
> version of ld-linux.so.
>
> >How compatible is Fedora with Red Hat and (Oracle Linux)?
>
> It depends on what you need. They all use the same packaging system.
> Fedora is using systemd instead of init for starting processes. There
> is support for init scripts, but the differences could matter for some
> stuff.
>
> I do run sqlplus on a F17 machine at work. I needed to label some of
> the bundled libraries since they were not correctly built (I think
> they used writeable segments) and selinux blocks them by default.
> That is a long way from running an oracle database instance though.
>
> The livecd mailing list is probably not the best place to ask
> about this.
> This is going to hit a much smaller part of the Fedora population,
> than
> say the users list, and really your question isn't live CD
> specific even
> though you are planning to use a live image for your work.
>
>
>
> --
> livecd mailing list
> livecd at lists.fedoraproject.org
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/livecd
F16 does have it: /lib/ld-linux.so.2
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/livecd/attachments/20120501/9bfb0194/attachment.html>
More information about the livecd
mailing list