Drupal Versioning in EPEL

[Sven Lankes]

On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 08:42:06AM -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote:

> I like all of this.  I can understand aesthetically why we should rename 
> drupal to drupal6 in preparation for drupal7, but my laziness says we 
> could leave it alone and just do drupal7 when it's ready.
> Even though the rename would be needed for the base package and all the 
> modules, and would be a bit of a pain, but it would make the maintenance 
> and cross porting of modules between Fedora and EPEL simpler.

I like this too (but I would say we do it now rather than later).

But I wonder if we should asked fesco about naming and multiple
concurrent versions as doing so is generally frowned upon in
Fedora-land.
 
> Maybe we do this only in rawhide?

Yeah - touching F12-F14 now sounds like a bad idea. If we get the
rename done soonish, I would hold back the new modules I've packaged and
only put them in F15 and Rawhide after the rename is done.

I'm happy to do the rename reviews.

-- 
sven === jabber/xmpp: sven at lankes.net