Drupal Versioning in EPEL

[Toshio Kuratomi]

On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 01:40:11PM -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote:
> Paul W. Frields wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 05:01:42PM +0200, Sven Lankes wrote:
> >   
> >> On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 10:47:49AM -0400, Eric Sparks Christensen wrote:
> >>
> >>     
> >>>>> And it's now basically decided that I need to take the X out of the
> >>>>> EVR for all modules, and transtion drupal* to drupal6* in rawhide, and
> >>>>> to drupal5* in EL-5? If this is correct, I'll get on it this week.
> >>>>>           
> >>>> Unless we want to suggest a change to the FPC which I wouldn't know how
> >>>> to justify.
> >>>>         
> >>>> I'll change my pending review request to use drupal6* and only request
> >>>> branches for F15 and EL.
> >>>>         
> >>> In my opinion this needs to happen.  Let's put together a request for
> >>> the FPC or whoever to evaluate.  This shouldn't be a big deal and we
> >>> are not going to get anywhere just going back and forth here.
> >>> Clearly there is a need here and we can make this happen sooner.
> >>>       
> >> Correct me if I'm wrong but I feel that we have now agreed on:
> >>
> >>  1. rename drupal to drupal6 in F15+
> >>
> >>  2. EL5 and EL6 get drupal6 (no change - this is already in testing)
> >>
> >>     
> Just getting to submitting reviews for these.   I wanted to sanity-check 
> something, please tell me if this doesn't work. 
> 
> We want to rename drupal to drupal6 in F15+.  We have drupal6 already, 
> and it already has a devel branch due to the dist-git no-devel-branch 
> thingy.  Should I not just dead.package drupal in master, 
> un-dead-package drupal6 in master, and have it there, and only there, 
> obsolete drupal == 6?
>
That works -- since it's a different package from what's currently in
drupal6 (more like the current drupal), you might want to put it up for
review anyhow... I think that is keeping with the spirit of FESCo's "you
need a rereview on renaming" policy even if taking the shortcut obeys the
letter of the policy.

-Toshio
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/logistics/attachments/20101025/f2c836fb/attachment.bin