Feedback from Distrowatch

[Elad Alfassa]

On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 10:01 AM, Danishka Navin <danishka at gmail.com> wrote:

>
>
> On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 12:12 PM, Rahul Sundaram <metherid at gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> Hi
>>
>> Serious question; Should the Fedora logo be changed?
>>
>
> No!
> Seriously why we should change our logo for few people (it was just a
> sample)
>
> I have never heard such thing from my community.
>
> anyway other projects do not have that advantage ;-)
>
>
>
>>
>> http://distrowatch.com/weekly.php?issue=20120507#news
>>
>> '
>> The Fedora website provided fairly positive results. Everyone was able
>> to find an appropriate download link for the Fedora ISOs. Likewise,
>> people were able to find the documentation to walk them through an
>> installation without too much trouble. What I found a bit amusing was
>> that almost a third of the participants thought Fedora was some sort of
>> Facebook plugin or application instead of a full operating system, due
>> to the project's logo. This is one of those things people inside the
>> Linux community would probably never consider, but there's a bit of a
>> confusion over the brand (apparently) where outsiders are concerned."
>>
>> Rahul
>>
>> --
>> websites mailing list
>> websites at lists.fedoraproject.org
>> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/websites
>
>
>
>
> --
> Danishka Navin
> http://danishkanavin.blogspot.com
> http://twitter.com/danishkanavin
> http://www.flickr.com/photos/danishkanavin/
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> websites mailing list
> websites at lists.fedoraproject.org
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/websites
>

Just a little reminder, Fedora was around BEFORE Facebook. If there is
anyone who should change their logo, it's Facebook, not us.

-- 
-Elad Alfassa.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/marketing/attachments/20120508/4f7616ca/attachment.html>