[In the News] Fedora 17 & GNOME 3.4: Return to a useful Linux desktop (Review)

Krzysztof Hajdamowicz uosiumen at gmail.com
Sun May 20 18:22:05 UTC 2012


20 maj 2012 02:44, "Davi Garcia" <davigarcia at fedoraproject.org> napisał(a):
>
> Hi all,
>
> On Sat, May 19, 2012 at 2:58 PM, Jason Brooks
> <jasonbrooks at fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> > In a brief ZDNet review, Steven J. Vaughan-Nichols offers faint praise
> > for Fedora 17:
>
> "That said, I did find this new Fedora with GNOME to be usable. I have
> to say I didn’t find the last version to be at all useful. Still, I’m
> left wondering why Fedora and GNOME first went in such a mis-guided
> direction in the first place. It’s great that Fedora and GNOME are
> much better than they were, but they’re still not for me, anyway, as
> useful as the last Fedora with GNOME 2.x was. I can see that Fedora is
> better, but I’m going to be sticking with Linux Mint, Ubuntu, and
> openSUSE for my daily desktop use."
>
> To tell you the truth, I don't understand what people see of too bad
> in Gnome 3.X. I confess that I had some difficult at the beginning,
> but after some days, I loved it! Gnome 3 is the redefinition of the
> concept of desktop enviroment. Maybe people be just afraid of the
> change...
>

To be honest, I've moved from Fedora 16 with GNOME 3 into Ubuntu with Unity
environment and I'm amazed. Ubuntu eats less RAM, gives better battery
consumption results and most important: Unity made me more productive.
And yes, I liked GNOME 3 and I feel native in it

> []s,
> Davi Garcia
>
> Fedora Project's Contributor
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:davigarcia
> --
> marketing mailing list
> marketing at lists.fedoraproject.org
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/marketing
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/marketing/attachments/20120520/dc2b82e5/attachment.html>


More information about the marketing mailing list