<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 TRANSITIONAL//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; CHARSET=UTF-8">
<META NAME="GENERATOR" CONTENT="GtkHTML/3.6.2">
</HEAD>
<BODY>
Hello, my name is Guy also known as 'misfit-toy' on #fedora.<BR>
An unfortunate choice of nicks made while my daughter was watching rudolph the rednose reindeer.<BR>
<BR>
In any case, I am joining in here at the direction of mether and quaid to bring up two web sites I have that are devoted to fedora and see what direction I should take, if any...<BR>
<BR>
The 1st site is <A HREF="http://fedorasolved.com">http://fedorasolved.com</A> which is what I call a 'reverse forum' in which there are no questions, only answers. Users post issues they have resolved themselves. There are no followup questions unless a 'fix' post is called into question.<BR>
<BR>
The 2nd site is one formed recently by a number of independent website owners such as myself in the hopes of getting some kind of cohesion amongst us 'third party' sites. <A HREF="http://fedorasolved.com/fccp">http://fedorasolved.com/fccp</A><BR>
<BR>
I suppose my first question is one of authenticity? i.e. do you think these sites are valid in the eyes of fedora-marketing and should they continue as is, or change, or close? <BR>
<BR>
Fedorasolved is getting quite a bit of traffic lately as people pick up on it, but I have avoided 'self promotion'.<BR>
<BR>
Are there any plans to incorporate listings of private websites such as mine and others or are we on our own or are we stepping on toes here?<BR>
<BR>
Just a few starter questions.<BR>
<BR>
Hope to participate here.<BR>
Thanks for your consideration.<BR>
<BR>
p.s. I am posting this identical email to fedora-docs but not cross-posting it, so if you are on both lists forgive me for the duplication.<BR>
<BR>
<TABLE CELLSPACING="0" CELLPADDING="0" WIDTH="100%">
<TR>
<TD>
-- <BR>
W. Guy Thomas <<A HREF="mailto:mrguytx@austin.rr.com">mrguytx@austin.rr.com</A>>
</TD>
</TR>
</TABLE>
</BODY>
</HTML>