Yep. Agree. <br><br>On Sunday, 7 February 2016, Justin W. Flory <<a href="mailto:jflory7@gmail.com">jflory7@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">On 02/07/2016 07:25 PM, Neville A. Cross wrote:<br>
> On Sun, February 7, 2016 4:17 pm, Justin W. Flory wrote:<br>
>> On 02/07/2016 04:58 PM, charles profitt wrote:<br>
>><br>
>>> I did not want to change the substance in the article written by<br>
>>> William, but I think the language could be softened.<br>
>>><br>
>>><br>
>>> ---- current ----<br>
>>> Neville has a love-hate relationship with GNOME. All of his computers<br>
>>> have it. The hate part comes from the changing nature of GNOME. The<br>
>>> developers move functionality and do not do a good job of documenting<br>
>>> where that feature went. Cross makes special note that the most annoying<br>
>>> item is the “connect to server†function in Nautilus ----<br>
>>><br>
>>><br>
>>> ---- possible revision ----<br>
>>> Neville has a love-hate relationship with GNOME. While all of his<br>
>>> computer run Ghome there are times when his productivity is impacted due<br>
>>> to changes in where features are located. One example is the connect to<br>
>>> server function in Nautilus. Neville believes that the issue could<br>
>>> easily be resolved with better documentation with regards to changes.<br>
>>> ----<br>
>>><br>
>>><br>
>>> I think this keeps the substance roughly the same, but makes the<br>
>>> message a bit more subtle.<br>
>>><br>
>>> Thoughts?<br>
>>><br>
>><br>
>> I'm personally +1 to this proposed revision. I think this is a better<br>
>> compromise while still maintaining the original point intended by Neville.<br>
>><br>
>><br>
>> Let's see if this sounds okay to Neville.<br>
>><br>
><br>
> I am in a rural area with bad coverage and even worse data on my cell.<br>
><br>
> I keep using gnome because is what Fedora has as primary focus. As<br>
> ambassador I represent fedora and therefore I need to be able to talk to<br>
> people about gnome and show that it comes fluid, I am not guessing. Now is<br>
> workstation and I feel that is it expected to endorse it as ambassador.<br>
> Specially when everybody else in the local community is ditching gnome for<br>
> various different reasons.<br>
><br>
> So, if you want to scratch all that and just write that I use wirkstation,<br>
> it if fine by me.<br>
><br>
> The rewording is very good. If you want to keep some of the balanced view,<br>
> I think it is very diplomatic.<br>
><br>
> Thanks for reviewing my interview.<br>
><br>
> Neville<br>
<br>
Thanks for chiming in Neville -- with the above in mind, I believe using<br>
Charles' revision will be best.<br>
<br>
--<br>
Cheers,<br>
Justin W. Flory<br>
<a href="javascript:;" onclick="_e(event, 'cvml', 'jflory7@gmail.com')">jflory7@gmail.com</a><br>
<br>
</blockquote>