future of mingw

Erik van Pienbroek erik at vanpienbroek.nl
Fri Jun 3 15:10:47 UTC 2011


fkooman at tuxed.net schreef op vr 03-06-2011 om 17:03 [+0200]:
> On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 4:39 PM, Erik van Pienbroek <erik at vanpienbroek.nl> wrote:
> > Please don't let this all discourage you. If you (or anybody else) can
> > come up with methods to making the example spec file at
> > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:MinGW_Future more readable and
> > smaller I would be glad to hear about it so we can use it for future
> > mingw packages!
> 
> Not smaller, but there seems to be a typo in the example spec file:
> 
> BuildRequires:  mingw32-binutils
> BuildRequires:  mingw32-binutils
> 
> Twice the same line, one of them should probably be
> mingw64-binutils... If not, one of the lines can be removed making the
> spec file smaller ;)

Thanks for spotting this. The second one is supposed to be mingw64.
I'll get this typo fixed once the legal issues surrounding mingw-w64
have been cleared and before we start enforcing the new guidelines.

Kind regards,

Erik van Pienbroek




More information about the mingw mailing list