[Bug 858084] Review Request: mingw-qt5-qtwebkit - Qt5 for Windows - QtWebKit component

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Thu Aug 15 05:38:58 UTC 2013


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=858084



--- Comment #13 from Michael Cronenworth <mike at cchtml.com> ---
$ rpmlint Downloads/mingw-qt5-qtwebkit-5.1.0-2.fc20.src.rpm 
mingw-qt5-qtwebkit.src:30: W: macro-in-comment %{snapshot_rev}
mingw-qt5-qtwebkit.src:30: W: macro-in-comment %{snapshot_rev}
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings.

$ rpmlint Downloads/mingw-qt5-qtwebkit.spec 
Downloads/mingw-qt5-qtwebkit.spec:30: W: macro-in-comment %{snapshot_rev}
Downloads/mingw-qt5-qtwebkit.spec:30: W: macro-in-comment %{snapshot_rev}
0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings.

+ OK
! needs attention

+ The package is named according to Fedora MinGW packaging guidelines
+ The spec file name matches the base package name.
+ The package meets the Packaging Guidelines
+ The package is licensed with a Fedora approved license and meets the
  Licensing Guidelines.
+ The license field in the spec file matches the actual license
+ The stated license is the same as the one for the corresponding
  native Fedora package
! The package contains the license file (COPYING.lib)
+ Spec file is written in American English
+ Spec file is legible
+ Upstream sources match sources in the srpm. md5sum:
  fad7e7d6637719c2be101f9b3957d451 
Downloads/qtwebkit-opensource-src-5.1.0.tar.xz
  fad7e7d6637719c2be101f9b3957d451 
rpmbuild/SOURCES/qtwebkit-opensource-src-5.1.0.tar.xz
+ The package builds in koji
n/a ExcludeArch bugs filed
+ BuildRequires look sane
n/a locale handling
n/a ldconfig in %post and %postun
+ Package does not bundle copies of system libraries
n/a Package isn't relocatable
+ Package owns all directories it creates
+ No duplicate files in %files
+ Permissions are properly set
+ Consistent use of macros
+ The package must contain code or permissible content
n/a Large documentation files should go in -doc subpackage
+ Files marked %doc should not affect package
n/a Header files should be in -devel
Not applicable to MinGW packages.
n/a Static libraries should be in -static
n/a Library files that end in .so must go in a -devel package
n/a -devel must require the fully versioned base
+ Packages must not contain libtool .la files
n/a Packages containing GUI apps must include %{name}.desktop file
+ Directory ownership sane
+ Filenames are valid UTF-8

-----
Summary:
 - License files are missing. See native package for how to handle this.
 - The rest looks OK.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=dI10jWBX70&a=cc_unsubscribe


More information about the mingw mailing list