<div dir="ltr">I have one package that this might affect, but I won't know for sure how it affects it until the feature is introduced. Currently in mingw-clucene I have threading disabled on 64-bit platforms because of issues with linking it against the existing threads library. Once a new threading library is introduced I would have to test build against that to see if it fixes the 64-bit problem and/or if it introduces additional problems.<div>
<br></div><div style>I'm in favor of improved threads, though, as a general thing!</div><div style><br></div><div style>--Greg</div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 5:57 AM, Erik van Pienbroek <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:erik@vanpienbroek.nl" target="_blank">erik@vanpienbroek.nl</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Erik van Pienbroek schreef op wo 24-04-2013 om 20:13 [+0200]:<br>
<div class="im"><br>
> What are your thoughts about introducing winpthreads in Fedora and<br>
> having gcc use it by default? I personally think that Fedora 20 is a<br>
> good target for this. If it turns out that it causes too much issues<br>
> then we still have enough time to do the necessary reverts well before<br>
> Fedora 20 is released (fall 2013).<br>
<br>
</div>Does nobody have an opinion about this proposal?<br>
<div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5"><br>
<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
mingw mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:mingw@lists.fedoraproject.org">mingw@lists.fedoraproject.org</a><br>
<a href="https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/mingw" target="_blank">https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/mingw</a></div></div></blockquote></div><br></div>