[Fedora-music-list] qjackctl approval/sponsorship?
Greg DeKoenigsberg
gdk at redhat.com
Thu Jun 8 17:09:31 UTC 2006
On Thu, 8 Jun 2006, Anthony Green wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-06-07 at 12:39 -0700, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote:
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191239
> >
> > Final comment says:
> >
> > > Looks good. I can't give final approval, but this is approve-able in
> > > my opinion. Someone please sponsor Fernando, we need him. :)
> >
> > So.... where do I go from here? I have other packages I'd like to submit
> > as well (and qsynth[*] is waiting and has had no comments so far - I
> > doubt it is a perfect package! :-)
>
> I am not a sponsor unfortunately.
>
> The NEEDSPONSOR bugzilla says: "People should not sit in NEED-SPONSOR
> status and just expect sponsorship. The best way to get sponsorship is
> to continue doing other work, like reviewing other packages, giving
> helpful advice, or submitting more packages for review. Having approved
> packages is *NOT* the requirement for gaining cvsextras sponsorship.
> Instead demonstrating that you understand the packaging guidelines and
> Fedora process to sponsor members is what is necessary to gain
> sponsorship."
>
> So my suggestions are:
>
> 1. Continue to submit RPMs
> 2. Post to this list when you do submit RPMs for review (I'll do the same)
> 3. All of us interested in audio apps should comment in bugzilla
>
> Eventually one of the sponsors will wake up and realize that we need
> you. I also think that lots of bugzilla traffic will help get packages
> reviewed and approved faster as well.
FWIW, I'm also actively lobbying for your sponsorship.
--g
-------------------------------------------------------------
Greg DeKoenigsberg || Fedora Project || fedoraproject.org
Be an Ambassador || http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Ambassadors
-------------------------------------------------------------
More information about the music
mailing list