[Fedora-music-list] qjackctl approval/sponsorship?

Greg DeKoenigsberg gdk at redhat.com
Thu Jun 8 17:09:31 UTC 2006


On Thu, 8 Jun 2006, Anthony Green wrote:

> On Wed, 2006-06-07 at 12:39 -0700, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote:
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191239
> > 
> > Final comment says:
> > 
> > > Looks good. I can't give final approval, but this is approve-able in
> > > my opinion. Someone please sponsor Fernando, we need him. :)
> > 
> > So.... where do I go from here? I have other packages I'd like to submit
> > as well (and qsynth[*] is waiting and has had no comments so far - I
> > doubt it is a perfect package! :-)
> 
> I am not a sponsor unfortunately.
> 
> The NEEDSPONSOR bugzilla says: "People should not sit in NEED-SPONSOR
> status and just expect sponsorship.  The best way to get sponsorship is
> to continue doing other work, like reviewing other packages, giving
> helpful advice, or submitting more packages for review.  Having approved
> packages is *NOT* the requirement for gaining cvsextras sponsorship.  
> Instead demonstrating that you understand the packaging guidelines and
> Fedora process to sponsor members is what is necessary to gain
> sponsorship."
> 
> So my suggestions are:
> 
> 1. Continue to submit RPMs
> 2. Post to this list when you do submit RPMs for review (I'll do the same)
> 3. All of us interested in audio apps should comment in bugzilla
> 
> Eventually one of the sponsors will wake up and realize that we need
> you. I also think that lots of bugzilla traffic will help get packages
> reviewed and approved faster as well.

FWIW, I'm also actively lobbying for your sponsorship.

--g

-------------------------------------------------------------
Greg DeKoenigsberg || Fedora Project || fedoraproject.org
Be an Ambassador || http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Ambassadors
-------------------------------------------------------------




More information about the music mailing list