<div dir="ltr">OK, sorry. I neglected to install the boost-devel package. I have done that now and the /waf configure worked, so the actual compilation should as also work. It's about 1/4 of the way done. I will report back...<div>
<font color="#333333" face="Monaco, Menlo, Consolas, Courier New, monospace"><span style="line-height:20px;white-space:pre-wrap"><br></span></font></div><div><font color="#333333" face="Monaco, Menlo, Consolas, Courier New, monospace"><span style="line-height:20px;white-space:pre-wrap">Sean</span></font></div>
</div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Sat, Oct 12, 2013 at 12:19 AM, Sean Beeson <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:seanbeeson@gmail.com" target="_blank">seanbeeson@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr">Christopher,<div><br></div><div>On following the instructions I get...</div><div><br></div><div><div>[root@localhost 3.4]# ./waf configure</div>
<div>Setting top to : /opt/ardour/3.4 </div>
<div>Setting out to : /opt/ardour/3.4/build </div><div>Checking for 'gcc' (c compiler) : /usr/bin/gcc </div><div>Checking for 'g++' (c++ compiler) : /usr/bin/g++ </div>
<div><br></div><div>Global Configuration </div><div> * Install prefix : /usr/local </div><div> * Debuggable build : True </div><div> * Build documentation : False </div>
<div><br></div><div>Ardour Configuration </div><div> * Will build against private GTK dependency stack : no </div><div> * Will rely on libintl built into libc : yes </div><div> * Will build against private Ardour dependency stack : no </div>
<div>Checking for boost library >= 1.39 : too old</div><div>Please install boost version 1.39 or higher. </div><div>The configuration failed</div><div>(complete log in /opt/ardour/3.4/build/config.log)</div>
</div><div><br></div><div>I have boost 1.53 installed, so I am not sure at this point what to try. I am building this on a F19 <span style="color:rgb(51,51,51);font-family:'Open Sans',Helvetica,Arial,sans-serif;font-size:14px">x86_64. </span></div>
<span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888">
<div><span style="color:rgb(51,51,51);font-family:'Open Sans',Helvetica,Arial,sans-serif;font-size:14px"><br></span></div><div><span style="color:rgb(51,51,51);font-family:'Open Sans',Helvetica,Arial,sans-serif;font-size:14px">Sean</span></div>
</font></span></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div class="im">On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 5:29 AM, Christopher R. Antila <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:crantila@fedoraproject.org" target="_blank">crantila@fedoraproject.org</a>></span> wrote:<br>
</div><div><div class="h5"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div>On 09/11/2013 12:42 PM, Sean Beeson wrote:<br>
> Is compiling for source the only way to still get Ardour 3 on Fedora 19?<br>
><br>
> If so, does anyone have any good how to on dealing with the dependencies?<br>
<br>
</div>Hi Sean:<br>
<br>
With little effort, I found these instructions for Ardour 3.1:<br>
<a href="https://blogs.fsfe.org/samtuke/?p=548" target="_blank">https://blogs.fsfe.org/samtuke/?p=548</a><br>
<br>
Please let us know whether they still work.<br>
<br>
However, I feel we should start a discussion on what to do about Ardour,<br>
now that they have asked distributions not to package their software.<br>
This is actually a serious ethical dilemma.<br>
<br>
Possible Options Include:<br>
<br>
1.) Package Ardour 3 against the developers' wishes, making no<br>
additional changes.<br>
<br>
2.) Package Ardour 3 against the developers' wishes, making some change<br>
that encourages donating money to the project.<br>
<br>
3.) Continue to package Ardour 2, accepting responsibility for<br>
maintaining software that's abandoned by the upstream developers.<br>
<br>
4.) Drop Ardour from the distribution, since we do not wish to maintain<br>
the Ardour 2.8.x series or package the Ardour 3.x series against the<br>
developers' wishes.<br>
<br>
5.) ?<br>
<br>
I favour the first or second options, since the free software audio<br>
community is so small that we can't afford the added difficulty of using<br>
such an important piece of software. On the other hand, the free<br>
software audio community is so small that we can't afford creating a<br>
rift with the Ardour developers. If we choose one of these options, we<br>
should be sure to involve the developers in our decision-making process.<br>
<br>
If the SIG wishes, I would be happy to research the state of Ardour in<br>
other distributions.<br>
<br>
<br>
Christopher<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
music mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:music@lists.fedoraproject.org" target="_blank">music@lists.fedoraproject.org</a><br>
<a href="https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/music" target="_blank">https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/music</a></blockquote></div></div></div><br></div>
</blockquote></div><br></div>