[Bug 249522] Review Request: sepostgresql - Security-Enhanced PostgreSQL
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Sun Aug 5 17:16:03 UTC 2007
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: sepostgresql - Security-Enhanced PostgreSQL
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249522
------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2007-08-05 13:16 EST -------
(In reply to comment #15)
> The translation of "/usr/sbin -> %_sbindir" also targets /usr/sbin/semodule?
Yes.
> In my understanding, the location of external commands don't have any
> relationship with %_prefix of sepostgresql.
- Actually policycoreutils spec file uses %_sbindir . Using proper
macros is necessary because we have to make it sure that spec files in
Fedora follow FHS. So we expect that semodule is under %_sbindir.
Let's say %_prefix changes, then if macros are used properly, all the
affected commands will change the location properly. If you still
use /usr/sbin, it surely fails.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
More information about the package-review
mailing list