[Bug 459916] Review Request: freedink-dfarc - Frontend and .dmod installer for GNU FreeDink

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459916





--- Comment #5 from Sylvain Beucler <beuc at beuc.net>  2008-09-03 05:14:21 EDT ---
I think that people installing 'freedink' will expect to get the front-end.

I think it would be best to have:
- freedink (empty package) - Requires: freedink-engine, freedink-dfarc
- freedink-engine - Requires: freedink-data
- dfarc - Requires: <none>
- freedink-data - Requires: <none>

What do you think?

> By the way, share/README and COPYING.DFArc-2.0 seem to be saying that
> share/pixmaps/dfarc.png is licensed under COPYING.DFArc-2.0 and
> it doesn't seem COPYING.DFArc-2.0 is enough free.  How do you think?

The license looks free enough to me.  Were you confused by the stanza about the
"Dink Media" (which references a completely different set of files, and which
was incidentally released this month under the zlib license, cf. #459915)?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.