[Bug 461131] Review Request: sim - Simple Instant Messenger

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Thu Sep 4 14:13:42 UTC 2008


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461131


Patrice Dumas <pertusus at free.fr> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |pertusus at free.fr




--- Comment #3 from Patrice Dumas <pertusus at free.fr>  2008-09-04 10:13:41 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #2)

> So, I have 3 questions:
> 1) Why symlink to library is considered as "devel-file"??

It is used to link against the library with -lsim at build time. 
It is not used at runtime. So it should be in devel such that
one have to install the devel package to link against the library.
The file used at runtime should be like 

/usr/lib/libsim.so.?????

and the library should have a 'soname' in the binary ELF headers that
causes the dynamic loader, ld to load the library. 

> 2) So, file AUTHORS in upstream SVN has 0 size. Should I exclude them from
> package?? I think I shouldn't - what if it filling in future.

This one is up to you, leave it in if you prefer to.

> 3) License tag I set to GPLv2 by included in source text of license, but I
> doubt: On sites (http://sim-im.org/wiki/Main_Page ,
> http://developer.berlios.de/projects/sim-im/ ) it is marked just us "GPL".

The source of information, here, are the file headers, and the
README or the like that should state the author's intention.
If there is nothing else that 'this is under the GPL', this means
GPL+
that is any version of the GPL, and not GPLv2.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.




More information about the package-review mailing list