[Bug 621416] Review Request: libgeotiff -- GeoTIFF format library

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=621416

--- Comment #6 from Volker Fröhlich <volker27 at gmx.at> 2010-08-10 18:36:57 EDT ---
I've contacted upstream about the license and they'll change the file LICENSE.

I altered the loop a tad, since the chmod wouldn't catch it's target.

The manpages in an rpm-package don't have to be compressed? Are there different
opinions on whether to keep the devel-manpages at all? Having this question
pending, I haven't sorted out all issues associated with the manpages, Martin
has pointed out.

Sadly there are some binaries that completely lack documentation. They are new
for the release.

I guess, I can drop -r from the rm -rf, that only removes a single file, can I?

Spec URL: http://geofrogger.net/review/libgeotiff.spec
SRPM URL: http://geofrogger.net/review/libgeotiff-1.3.0-2.fc12.src.rpm

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.