[Bug 564466] Review Request: ubuntutitle-fonts - decorative font of Ubuntu logo

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Mon Feb 22 14:54:47 UTC 2010


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=564466

Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
         AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org    |nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net
               Flag|                            |needinfo?(paul at frixxon.co.u
                   |                            |k)

--- Comment #6 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net> 2010-02-22 09:54:45 EST ---
Thanks both of you for the work, sorry I was busy elsewhere, here is a review

1. (blocking) as per fonts packaging guidelines the organisation releasing the
fonts should be used to prefix the package name, so the package name should be
ubuntu-title-fonts
(package names are a PITA to change after import, try to get them right from
the start)

http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:FontsPolicy#Naming


2. It's not a good idea to include this kind of coverage info in the summary,
it will (hopefully) change over time and you want the summary to stay invariant
(esp. if we finally manage to get them translated)

If you want to add coverage hints be very general "partial basic latin" and not
so specific (note that "partial basic latin" is already borderline and
specific)


The rest if fine, just fix this and I'll approve the package

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



More information about the package-review mailing list