[Bug 530230] Review Request: plpa - Portable Linux Processor Affinity

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530230

Steve Traylen <steve.traylen at cern.ch> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Keywords|                            |Reopened
             Status|CLOSED                      |ASSIGNED
         Resolution|CANTFIX                     |

--- Comment #13 from Steve Traylen <steve.traylen at cern.ch> 2010-01-12 18:03:20 EST ---
Tom, thanks awfully for following this up. Pleased and impressed 
it is resolved.

I would be interested in the kind of clause that is needed for 
htop. In particular the whole motivation for plpa was to then add
on to the GPLv2 licensed SLURM. 
https://computing.llnl.gov/linux/slurm/slurm.html

Jussi, here are new amended packages now not blocked by a legal situation.
Version 1.3.2 and licensed as BSD and AMDPLPA.

http://cern.ch/straylen/rpms/plpa/plpa-1.3.2-1.fc12.src.rpm
http://cern.ch/straylen/rpms/plpa/plpa.spec

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.