[Bug 578269] Review Request: xgospel - An X11 client for Internet Go Server

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Wed Mar 31 01:14:43 UTC 2010


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=578269

Germán Racca <gracca at gmail.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |gracca at gmail.com

--- Comment #2 from Germán Racca <gracca at gmail.com> 2010-03-30 21:14:42 EDT ---
Hello jjwei:

Just a few comments on your package. I'm looking for sponsorship also.

It's useful to put the output of rpmlint here. I'm doing it for you:

[german at skytux Downloads]$ rpmlint
../rpmbuild/RPMS/i686/xgospel-1.12d-1.fc12.i686.rpm 
xgospel.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US weiqi -> weird, Weiss,
Weill
xgospel.i686: W: non-standard-group Games
xgospel.i686: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 1.12d-0.docs.1
['1.12d-1.fc12', '1.12d-1']
xgospel.i686: W: invalid-license GPL
xgospel.i686: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/bin/rport
xgospel.i686: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/bin/xgospel
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 6 warnings.

OK, the comments now:

** non-standard-group: the correct group should be "Amusements/Games" in this
case

** incoherent-version-in-changelog: the version should be "1.12d-1", and I also
think that one changelog entry with the list of all changes is enough in this
case, because all of them belong to version 1.12d-1

** invalid-license GPL: please read carefully the file "my/COPYRIGHTS" to
choose the proper value for this tag

Also, you don't need to put "gcc" in BuildRequires. See here:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Exceptions_2

Good luck!
Germán.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.


More information about the package-review mailing list