[Bug 672440] New: Review Request: flann - Fast Library for Approximate Nearest Neighbors
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Tue Jan 25 04:49:26 UTC 2011
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Review Request: flann - Fast Library for Approximate Nearest Neighbors
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=672440
Summary: Review Request: flann - Fast Library for Approximate
Nearest Neighbors
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
Component: Package Review
AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
ReportedBy: richmattes at gmail.com
QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org
CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com
Estimated Hours: 0.0
Classification: Fedora
Spec URL: http://rmattes.fedorapeople.org/RPMS/flann/flann.spec
SRPM URL: http://rmattes.fedorapeople.org/RPMS/flann/flann-1.6.7-1.fc14.src.rpm
Description:
FLANN is a library for performing fast approximate nearest neighbor searches
in high dimensional spaces. It contains a collection of algorithms found
to work best for nearest neighbor search and a system for automatically
choosing the best algorithm and optimum parameters depending on the data sets.
rpmlint:
$ rpmlint flann.spec ../RPMS/x86_64/flann*
flann.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libflann.so.1.6.7
exit at GLIBC_2.2.5
flann-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation
flann-python.x86_64: W: no-documentation
flann-static.x86_64: W: no-documentation
5 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 4 warnings.
The shared-lib-calls-exit issue is something to take up with upstream. The
package is pretty sparse on documentation, but the base package includes a pdf
manual and all the subpackages require the base package in one way or another.
scratch build:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2740732
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
More information about the package-review
mailing list