[Bug 630184] Review Request: lxappearance-obconf - Plugin to configure Openbox inside LXAppearance

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630184

--- Comment #13 from Christoph Wickert <cwickert at fedoraproject.org> 2011-07-16 03:53:27 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #11)
> Perhaps the License wiki needs to be updated to be more clear :) Library and
> Lesser both starting with L makes things confusing (not that GNU licenses need
> any help in that department.)

I think "L as in library" really helps.

Some rules of thumb:
1. GPL is more restrictive than LGPL because LGPL allows binaries that
erternally link the LGPL'ed libraries to have their own license, even a
proprietary one.
2. When mixing licenses, the most restrictive one applies. Code that links both
LGPL and GPL can no longer be LGPL.
3. If only one binary is created of different licenses, the package's license
tag is the more restrictive license. If however binaries and libraries are
build, the license tag of the package must mention both licenses, e.g. "GPLv2+
and LGPLv2+".
4. If yo uare unsure, look at the headers of the code itself.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.