[Bug 668820] Review Request: rubygem-rdoc - RDoc produces HTML and command-line documentation for Ruby projects

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=668820

--- Comment #21 from Vít Ondruch <vondruch at redhat.com> 2011-07-18 04:14:04 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #20)
Yeah, I was also thinking about it, but it would introduce new path which
nobody owns (or this package would own, but that is not nice anyway), it is not
in path, user does not know and does not expect that the binary is there, so at
the end I see more cons against pros.

It seems more favorable to teach ruby community that they can execute the gem
by:

ruby -rubygems -e "gem 'rdoc', '>= 0'; load Gem.bin_path('rdoc', 'rdoc',
'>=0')"

then to teach them new path.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.