[Bug 226114] Merge Review: m2crypto

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Thu Apr 5 18:39:28 UTC 2012


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226114

Jon Ciesla <limburgher at gmail.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
                 CC|                            |limburgher at gmail.com
         AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org    |limburgher at gmail.com
               Flag|                            |fedora-review?

--- Comment #1 from Jon Ciesla <limburgher at gmail.com> 2012-04-05 14:39:27 EDT ---
Good:

! rpmlint checks return:


m2crypto.x86_64: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding
/usr/share/doc/m2crypto-0.21.1/tests/thawte.pem
This file has wrong end-of-line encoding, usually caused by creation or
modification on a non-Unix system. It could prevent it from being displayed
correctly in some circumstances.

Fix until that would break the tests.

m2crypto.x86_64: E: zero-length
/usr/share/doc/m2crypto-0.21.1/demo/Zope/lib/python/Products/GuardedFile/refresh.txt

Ignore or remove.

! package meets naming guidelines   Should really be python-m2crypto.  If you
submit a rename review I'll do it.  Or this could be it, really.
- package meets packaging guidelines


! license ( MIT ) I see BSD-style, Apache 2.0, MIT, Zope Public License, should
this not reflect all of those?

- spec file legible, in am. english
- source matches upstream
- package compiles on devel (x86_64)
- no missing BR
- no unnecessary BR
- no locales
- not relocatable
- owns all directories that it creates
- no duplicate files
- permissions ok
- %clean ok
- macro use consistent
- code, not content
- no need for -docs
- nothing in %doc affects runtime
- no need for .desktop file 

So just rpmlint, name and license, otherwise OK.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.



More information about the package-review mailing list