[Bug 811601] Review Request: openstack-utils - Helper utilities for OpenStack services
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Mon Apr 23 16:00:07 UTC 2012
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=811601
Richard W.M. Jones <rjones at redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #5 from Richard W.M. Jones <rjones at redhat.com> 2012-04-23 12:00:06 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> General comment: I think you should add a comment about how Fedora
> itself is the upstream for this package. Also I think man pages would
> improve this package.
Both of these issues are fixed.
> - rpmlint output
>
> Some notable issues raised by rpmlint:
>
> openstack-utils.src: W: strange-permission openstack-config 0775L
> openstack-utils.src: W: strange-permission openstack-status 0775L
> openstack-utils.src: W: strange-permission openstack-demo-install 0775L
> openstack-utils.src: W: strange-permission openstack-db 0775L
Fixed by using `install -m' in spec file.
> openstack-utils.noarch: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding
> /usr/share/doc/openstack-utils-2012.1/LICENSE
Fixed upstream.
> openstack-utils.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary openstack-demo-install
> openstack-utils.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary openstack-config
> openstack-utils.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary openstack-status
> openstack-utils.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary openstack-db
Fixed by adding man pages for all utilities.
> I'm not sure what this one means:
>
> openstack-utils.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
> /usr/bin/openstack-config
We agree this is not important.
=========================
This package is APPROVED by rjones
=========================
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
More information about the package-review
mailing list