[Bug 819099] Review Request: gf2x - polynomial multiplication over the binary field

Sat Aug 4 17:53:41 UTC 2012

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=819099

Mario Blättermann <mario.blaettermann at gmail.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
           Assignee|nobody at fedoraproject.org    |mario.blaettermann at gmail.co
                   |                            |m
              Flags|                            |fedora-review+

--- Comment #3 from Mario Blättermann <mario.blaettermann at gmail.com> ---
Successful scratch build:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4359153

$ rpmlint -i -v *
gf2x.i686: I: checking
gf2x.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US trinomials -> binomials,
mistrials
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.

gf2x.i686: I: checking-url http://gf2x.gforge.inria.fr/ (timeout 10 seconds)
gf2x.i686: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib/libgf2x.so.1.0.0 exit at GLIBC_2.0
This library package calls exit() or _exit(), probably in a non-fork()
context. Doing so from a library is strongly discouraged - when a library
function calls exit(), it prevents the calling program from handling the
error, reporting it to the user, closing files properly, and cleaning up any
state that the program has. It is preferred for the library to return an
actual error code and let the calling program decide how to handle the
situation.

gf2x.src: I: checking
gf2x.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US trinomials -> binomials,
mistrials
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.

gf2x.src: I: checking-url http://gf2x.gforge.inria.fr/ (timeout 10 seconds)
gf2x.src: I: checking-url
https://gforge.inria.fr/frs/download.php/30873/gf2x-1.1.tar.gz (timeout 10
seconds)
gf2x.x86_64: I: checking
gf2x.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US trinomials -> binomials,
mistrials
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.

gf2x.x86_64: I: checking-url http://gf2x.gforge.inria.fr/ (timeout 10 seconds)
gf2x.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libgf2x.so.1.0.0
exit at GLIBC_2.2.5
This library package calls exit() or _exit(), probably in a non-fork()
context. Doing so from a library is strongly discouraged - when a library
function calls exit(), it prevents the calling program from handling the
error, reporting it to the user, closing files properly, and cleaning up any
state that the program has. It is preferred for the library to return an
actual error code and let the calling program decide how to handle the
situation.

gf2x-debuginfo.i686: I: checking
gf2x-debuginfo.i686: I: checking-url http://gf2x.gforge.inria.fr/ (timeout 10
seconds)
gf2x-debuginfo.x86_64: I: checking
gf2x-debuginfo.x86_64: I: checking-url http://gf2x.gforge.inria.fr/ (timeout 10
seconds)
gf2x-devel.i686: I: checking
gf2x-devel.i686: I: checking-url http://gf2x.gforge.inria.fr/ (timeout 10
seconds)
gf2x-devel.i686: W: no-documentation
The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include
documentation files.

gf2x-devel.x86_64: I: checking
gf2x-devel.x86_64: I: checking-url http://gf2x.gforge.inria.fr/ (timeout 10
seconds)
gf2x-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation
The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include
documentation files.

7 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 7 warnings.

The same exit() problem as already mentioned above. However, it is a warning,
not an error message from rpmlint. Nowhere seen in the guidelines, how to
handle this or whether it is needed to do anything. That's why to be ignored.

---------------------------------
key:

[+] OK
[.] OK, not applicable
[X] needs work
---------------------------------

[+] MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[+] MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}.
[+] MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines.
[+] MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license.
    GPLv2+
[+] MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual
license.
[+] MUST: The file containing the text of the license(s) for the package must
be included in %doc.
[+] MUST: The spec file must be written in American English.
[+] MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible.
[+] MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source.
    $ sha256sum *
    0d3f01604680102a00ca34e079903cc4d5a3208afda223748979b724d358849f 
gf2x-1.1.tar.gz
    0d3f01604680102a00ca34e079903cc4d5a3208afda223748979b724d358849f 
gf2x-1.1.tar.gz.orig

[+] MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on
at least one primary architecture.
- See Koji build above.
[.] MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an
architecture, ...
[+] MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires.
[.] MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly.
[.] MUST: If a package installs files below %{_datadir}/icons, the icon cache
must be updated.
[+] MUST: Packages storing shared library files (not just symlinks) must call
ldconfig in %post and %postun.
[.] MUST: Packages must NOT bundle copies of system libraries.
[.] MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, ...
[+] MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. 
[+] MUST: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in %files.
[+] MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly.
[+] MUST: Packages must not provide RPM dependency information when that
information is not global in nature, or are otherwise handled.
[.] MUST: When filtering automatically generated RPM dependency information,
the filtering system implemented by Fedora must be used.
[+] MUST: Each package must consistently use macros.
[+] MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content.
[.] MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage.
[+] MUST: Files in %doc must not affect the runtime of the application.
[+] MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package.
[.] MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package.
[+] MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g.
libfoo.so.1.1), ...
[+] MUST: devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned
dependency.
[+] MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives.
[.] MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop
file
[.] MUST: .desktop files must be properly installed with desktop-file-install
in the %install section.
[+] MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other
packages.
[+] MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8.

[.] SHOULD: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a
    separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream...

[+] SHOULD: Timestamps of files should be preserved.
[+] SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
    See Koji build above (which uses mock anyway)
[.] SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package functions as described.
[+] SHOULD: If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane.
[.] SHOULD: Usually, subpackages other than devel should require the base
package using a fully versioned dependency.
[.] SHOULD: pkgconfig(.pc) files should be placed in a -devel pkg.
[.] SHOULD: If the package has file dependencies outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin,
/usr/bin, or /usr/sbin ...
[.] SHOULD: Your package should contain man pages for binaries/scripts.

--------------------------------------

PACKAGE APPROVED

--------------------------------------

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.