[Bug 877403] Review Request: svnkit - Pure Java Subversion client library

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Mon Dec 10 15:23:19 UTC 2012


Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=877403

Stanislav Ochotnicky <sochotni at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |sochotni at redhat.com

--- Comment #23 from Stanislav Ochotnicky <sochotni at redhat.com> ---
template.jar is OK, since it's just a tarball with some source templates.
However (future) maintainer should make sure with each new upstream release
that upstream didn't slip in some bundled binary code.

as for nailgun.jar: having it in SRPM *looks* OK, but in that case you need to
include ASL 2.0 license text to SRPM Sources (point 4.1 of ASL states you need
to distribute license text together with sources/binaries). No need to install
ASL 2.0 license since binary rpms don't contain any ASL 2.0 code it seems. That
said, the jar should definitely be removed during %prep. Using binaries during
build is strictly prohibited unless it's being used for bootstrapping (and
you'd need FESCO exception even for that). More about bundling:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:No_Bundled_Libraries

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=YxhwSLaogz&a=cc_unsubscribe



More information about the package-review mailing list