[Bug 768545] Review Request: blktap - blktap user space utilities
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Fri Jan 6 17:23:14 UTC 2012
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=768545
David Nalley <david at gnsa.us> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|VERIFIED |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #4 from David Nalley <david at gnsa.us> 2012-01-06 12:23:13 EST ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> FAIL SHOULD: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a
> separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
> [25]
https://github.com/xen-org/blktap/issues/1
Done
> FAIL SHOULD: The description and summary sections in the package spec file
> should contain translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
> [26]
There's no i18n support in this, so NA IMO. - moreover, I can't translate to
anything.
> FAIL SHOULD: your package should contain man pages for binaries/scripts. If
> it doesn't, work with upstream to add them where they make sense.[32]
I requested that upstream should create said man pages here:
https://github.com/xen-org/blktap/issues/2
In addition I discovered that libtool archives were being built and packaged. I
stripped these from the -devel package.
New SPEC: http://ke4qqq.fedorapeople.org/blktap.spec
New SRPM:
http://ke4qqq.fedorapeople.org/blktap-2.0.90-2.git20111216.62de90d.fc16.src.rpm
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
More information about the package-review
mailing list