[Bug 770740] Review Request: Morse - Simulates robots using the Blender Game Engine

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Sun Jan 8 22:32:16 UTC 2012


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=770740

--- Comment #4 from Spencer Jackson <spencerandrewjackson at yahoo.com> 2012-01-08 17:32:16 EST ---
Thanks, adev! I've applied your recommendations to the spec.

New spec URL: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/4517312/morse.spec
New SRPM URL: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/4517312/morse-0.4.1-2.fc16.src.rpm

rpmlint morse morse-debuginfo RPMS/x86_64/morse-0.4.1-2.fc16.x86_64.rpm
RPMS/x86_64/morse-debuginfo-0.4.1-2.fc16.x86_64.rpm
SRPMS/morse-0.4.1-2.fc16.src.rpm SPECS/morse.spec 
morse.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary morseexec
morse.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary morse
morse.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary morseexec
morse.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary morse
morse.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US middleware -> middle ware,
middle-ware, middleweight
morse.src: W: invalid-url Source0: laas-morse-0.4.1-0-g15dc857.tar.gz
SPECS/morse.spec: W: invalid-url Source0: laas-morse-0.4.1-0-g15dc857.tar.gz
5 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 7 warnings.

I just sent an email to the packaging list, (
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/packaging/2012-January/008067.html )
basically asking what to do about the middleware protocols which are supported
by Morse, but not packaged in Fedora. Some of these, like ROS, might take a
while to be supported. Any thoughts on how to handle that would be appreciated.

Upstream also recommended that I create subpackages for each middleware. That
makes a lot of sense, but I should probably figure out what's the best way to
handle the unsupported middlewares before I do that...

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



More information about the package-review mailing list