[Bug 844011] Review Request: openshift-origin-cartridge-abstract - OpenShift Origin common cartridge components

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=844011

--- Comment #6 from Michael Scherer <misc at zarb.org> ---
I am working on the review,but now I have a question. The review process ask me
to check :

"MUST Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime."

then why is there %{_libexecdir}/stickshift/cartridges/abstract/COPYRIGHT in
%doc ?

IE, if I choose to install the rpm with documentation disabled ( there is a
macro in rpm for that, and that's something that could be done for a livecd ),
would anything break, or is there some requirement to ship the license as part
of the cartdrige ? 

If that's the case and if that's required for runtime, then it should not be
tagged as %doc ( since it could be removed by error ), and if that's really
just documentation, why ship it in 2 places ?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.