[Bug 871037] Review Request: librcc - RusXMMS Charset Conversion Library

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Thu Nov 1 22:05:36 UTC 2012


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=871037

--- Comment #7 from Jerry James <loganjerry at gmail.com> ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> I will think about this. Before I need more knowledges about this
> posibilites. So I built a library with only thats requires which I enough
> good understand.

Sure, I understand.

> Thanks! I will forward this to upstream.

Let's patch the bug for Fedora, also, so Fedora users don't suffer its
(admittedly unknown) consequences.

> > Third, the unused direct shared library dependency warnings from rpmlint can
> > be eliminated by adding this to the %configure line:
> > LDFLAGS="-Wl,--as-needed $RPM_LD_FLAGS".
> Hm...

I don't understand your reply.  I actually did a build with the modified
%configure line I proposed, and it worked fine.  Eliminating unused library
links is a good thing; for example, it reduces address space pressure on 32-bit
builds.

> > Fourth, another option for the Source0 download URL is Source0:
> > http://downloads.sourceforge.net/rusxmms/%{name}-%{version}.tar.bz2 (see
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:SourceURL#Sourceforge.net).  (I'm
> > not saying you have to switch, just that sourceforge is a known quantity
> > when it comes to downloads.)
> Sourceforge hasn't librcc-0.2.9.tar.gz so I use dside.dyndns.org.
> I will request to an author to use sourceforge for all sources.

This works for me:

$ wget http://downloads.sourceforge.net/rusxmms/librcc-0.2.9.tar.bz2

So it looks like librcc-0.2.9.tar.bz2 is already there.


(In reply to comment #6)
> So do you approve the package?

I would first like to see a modified spec file with (a) a patch for the
off-by-one error, and (b) unused direct dependencies on shared libraries
eliminated (whether using -Wl,--as-needed or some other mechanism).

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.



More information about the package-review mailing list