[Bug 825557] Review Request: mingw-clucene - CLucene 2.3.3.4 built for MinGW

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=825557

--- Comment #14 from Kalev Lember <kalevlember at gmail.com> ---
We normally don't do -devel / library package splits in the MinGW packages;
everything is shipped in a single package. So instead of one -devel package and
two library package like the native build has, the MinGW build would just ship
everything in a single package.

The rationale for this is that these packages are only useful for developers
and for development purposes, and as such it doesn't make sense to split them
up, if everyone is going to install all the subpackages anyway.


> I can modify the naming scheme if you want, but I had just copied the
> scheme used by the native packages.

Oh this should be your choice, you are the Clucene expert. I don't know enough
of the project to make the decision. Just pointing out a possible mistake in
the packaging that is difficult to correct afterwards (source package renaming
needs a re-review).

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.