[Bug 891195] nodejs-inherits - A tiny simple way to do classic inheritance in js
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Sun Jan 6 14:03:28 UTC 2013
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=891195
Michael Scherer <misc at zarb.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC| |misc at zarb.org
Assignee|nobody at fedoraproject.org |misc at zarb.org
Flags| |fedora-review?
--- Comment #3 from Michael Scherer <misc at zarb.org> ---
Once the package is cleaned, I guess we can approve it.
Package Review
==============
Key:
[x] = Pass
[!] = Fail
[-] = Not applicable
[?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
Issues:
=======
- there is no License file, could you convince upstream to ship
a updated tarball with the LICENSE file ?
- some stuff to clean ( BuildRoot, etc )
===== MUST items =====
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[!]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
Note: rm -rf %{buildroot} present but not required
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[!]: Each %files section contains %defattr if rpm < 4.4
Note: %defattr present but not needed
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package is not known to require ExcludeArch.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[!]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s)
in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s)
for the package is included in %doc.
[x]: Package consistently uses macro is (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage.
Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 1 files.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present.
[x]: Spec file lacks Packager, Vendor, PreReq tags.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package do not use a name that already exist
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided
in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
===== SHOULD items =====
Generic:
[!]: Buildroot is not present
Note: Buildroot: present but not needed
[!]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
Note: %clean present but not required
[!]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file
from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[-]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[x]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
architectures.
[-]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files.
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin.
[x]: SourceX tarball generation or download is documented.
[x]: SourceX is a working URL.
[x]: Spec use %global instead of %define.
===== EXTRA items =====
Generic:
[x]: Large data in /usr/share should live in a noarch subpackage if package is
arched.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM.
Rpmlint
-------
Checking: nodejs-inherits-1.0.0-5.fc19.noarch.rpm
nodejs-inherits.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) js -> dis, ks, j
nodejs-inherits.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US js -> dis, ks,
j
nodejs-inherits.noarch: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings.
Rpmlint (installed packages)
----------------------------
# rpmlint nodejs-inherits
nodejs-inherits.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) js -> dis, ks, j
nodejs-inherits.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US js -> dis, ks,
j
nodejs-inherits.noarch: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings.
# echo 'rpmlint-done:'
Requires
--------
nodejs-inherits (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
nodejs(engine)
Provides
--------
nodejs-inherits:
nodejs-inherits
npm(inherits)
MD5-sum check
-------------
http://registry.npmjs.org/inherits/-/inherits-1.0.0.tgz :
CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package :
2be196fa6bc6a0c65fecd737af457589ef88b22a95d5dc31aab01d92ace48186
CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package :
2be196fa6bc6a0c65fecd737af457589ef88b22a95d5dc31aab01d92ace48186
Generated by fedora-review 0.2.0 (Unknown) last change: Unknown
Buildroot used: fedora-rawhide-x86_64
Command line :./try-fedora-review -m fedora-rawhide-x86_64 -b 891195
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=kShnsLPrU6&a=cc_unsubscribe
More information about the package-review
mailing list