[Bug 969700] Review Request: libccp4 - Library providing specific CCP4 functionality
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Tue Jun 4 06:28:55 UTC 2013
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=969700
--- Comment #2 from Tim Fenn <tim.fenn at gmail.com> ---
Thanks for the tips, comments and quick response, Mario!
(In reply to Mario Blättermann from comment #1)
>
> Spelling errors to be addressed:
>
> subcomponents → sub components
> centred → centered
>
Done.
>
> If you set an "Obsoletes" tag, you should also use a "Provides" tag for the
> same package, to get a proper upgrade path. Because of that we recognize
> your package as the successor of all gpp4 versions, explicite versioning is
> unneeded.
>
Done - edited spec contains:
Provides: libgpp4 = %{version}-%{release}
Obsoletes: libgpp4 < %{version}-%{release}
seem OK?
>
> The exit() call is not up to you to fix, but should be filed as an upstream
> bug.
>
OK - will do.
>
> Some parts of the spec file are obsolete for Fedora and EPEL <=5:
>
> * The initial cleaning of %{buildroot} in %install
> * The %clean section
> * The %defattr line in %files
>
cleaned up.
>
> Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release}
> has to be
> Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release}
>
Fixed.
>
> To require pkgconfig for the -devel package is unneeded, see what rpm adds
> automatically:
>
removed.
>
> Your package is LGPL licensed. This is OK so far, but you have to ship
> COPYING.LESSER instead of COPYING (which addresses the GPLv3). The latter
> doesn't affect any file in the tarball and can be ignored:
>
Ah, thanks - done!
updated files:
Spec URL: https://sites.google.com/site/timfenn/libccp4.spec
SRPM URL: https://sites.google.com/site/timfenn/libccp4-6.3.1-2.fc17.src.rpm
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=EM1Pnt63mr&a=cc_unsubscribe
More information about the package-review
mailing list