[Bug 929425] Review Request: juffed - Advanced text editor

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=929425

--- Comment #2 from Eugene A. Pivnev <ti.eugene at gmail.com> ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> Some initial comments,
> 
> 1.  subpkgs should have
> Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release}

Not mandatory. Plugins need just API, that is fixed for version.
So - juffed can be repackaged independently from plugins anf they will work -
if version is same.
In theory...
I'm not sure :-) - need testing.

> 3.  what's the purpose of splitting plugins into so many sub-packages? In
> short, please provide some justification for splitting these out. (Hint:
> makes the experience for end-user worse having to manually manage plugins). 
> I'd suggest either getting rid of -plugins subpackages altogether, or at
> least simplify matters some (maybe keep a single -plugins subpackage for all
> of them).

* Now all of plugins are in same git as juffed, but it is not mandatory. So -
if you will create e.g. juffed-plugin-htmlpreview (not in juffed's git) - you
will have juffed[, juffed-plugins] and juffed-plugin-htmlpreview. It is not
good, IMHO.
* You can install those plugins that you need - and nothing else, keeping
juffed  simpler and faster. As for me - I'd like to install juffed and
-plugin-symbolbrowser (sometimes - -sort, -filemanager; occasionally - -doclist
and -favorites). So - juffed-plugins is for lazy/fast installation.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=wz765cfBNc&a=cc_unsubscribe