[Bug 961907] Review Request: rubygem-moped - A MongoDB driver for Ruby

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Tue May 28 21:04:22 UTC 2013


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=961907

--- Comment #4 from Troy Dawson <tdawson at redhat.com> ---
Spec URL: http://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/rubygems/rubygem-moped.spec
SRPM URL:
http://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/rubygems/rubygem-moped-1.5.0-1.fc20.src.rpm

- latest version
-- updated to version 1.5.0

- %files section
-- I was being lazy.  I have fixed my lazyness.
-- LICENSE, in main package, marked at %doc
-- CHANGELOG and README.md, in doc subpackage, marked as %doc

- Description
-- I found a much more descriptive description.

- %check section
-- I downloaded, installed, and configured the check, but when I ran it I got
the following.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Moped runs specs for authentication and replica sets against MongoHQ.

If you want to run these specs and need the credentials, contact
durran at gmail dot com.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
and it then proceeded to fail the tests.
-- Although checks are very good, if they are not written for a rpm and koji
enviroment, they don't do us much good.  I'm pretty sure that durran does
not want the credentials public, which they would be if we included them
in the rpm.
-- Checks are strongly encouraged, but not required.  Since this check was 
not designed for an rpm enviroment, I removed it.

- Check against ruby 2.0
-- This is working fine in Fedora 19 and 20, both of which are using Ruby 2.0
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=5435348
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=5435353
-- We have also tested these rpm's with OpenShift Origin, running on Fedora 19
(running ruby 2.0) and it is working correctly.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=kmbm9ynRfL&a=cc_unsubscribe


More information about the package-review mailing list